<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Invoke &#124; Interactive Agency &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.invokemedia.com/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.invokemedia.com</link>
	<description>Hungry? Here's some food for thought.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>But I Wanted it Blue&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.invokemedia.com/but-i-wanted-it-blue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.invokemedia.com/but-i-wanted-it-blue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jenn Lowther</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invokemedia.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it's both an interesting and exciting moment; handing designs over to someone and waiting for them to view, judge and critique it, but it's also a little like having Regis fly out of your closet as your alarm clock goes off - it would scare the hell out of you if you weren't adequately prepared. See, what in your head may be functional, stylish or just plain cool may be totally be a Spiderman III moment for them. If it is, it's redesign-or-tweakin' time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fbut-i-wanted-it-blue%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fbut-i-wanted-it-blue%2F&amp;source=invoke&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt">Posted by James Wilson</span></p>
<p>* This blog post is part of Invoke&#8217;s participation in the 2008 Vancouver Blogathon for Charity</p>
<p>Walking a tightrope between design and desire. A designer&#8217;s thoughts.</p>
<p>I was talking to a friend of mine the other day who has somehow survived six years freelancing as a graphic designer. &#8220;A client of mine insisted that I let her design the look and feel of the site before she gave feedback&#8221; was a comment he breezily made at one point &#8211; as if the irony of the statement hadn&#8217;t occurred to him yet.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s both an interesting and exciting moment; handing designs over to someone and waiting for them to view, judge and critique it, but it&#8217;s also a little like having Regis fly out of your closet as your alarm clock goes off &#8211; it would scare the hell out of you if you weren&#8217;t adequately prepared. See, what in your head may be functional, stylish or just plain cool may be totally be a Spiderman III moment for them. If it is, it&#8217;s redesign-or-tweakin&#8217; time.</p>
<p>The worst type of feedback is the kind that morphs the design into a blob of ineffective mish-mash. It&#8217;s the feedback that usually runs along the lines of: &#8220;Ok&#8230; but could we make it more &#8216;wow!&#8217;?&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;d love to see a little more: &#8216;oooh!&#8217; there&#8230;&#8221;. Basically, it&#8217;s like telling a baker to make the bread more &#8216;risey&#8217;, or like saying you like a sunset because it&#8217;s, y&#8217;know &#8211; whatever.</p>
<p>Useful feedback incorporates an understanding of things, what do I want changed and why? Is it because I like another colour more or because another colour would convey this emotion better? Is it because I had a crappy game of poker last night and I want to berate someone over the internet? &#8230; OK that&#8217;s only happened twice, but it&#8217;s actually <em>after</em> the feedback when things get interesting.</p>
<p>OK, so Sally Sacramento wants this colour changed. Can I make this work or is it going to end up looking like a pair of Crocs? (I don&#8217;t care how comfortable they are, that designer needs to be beaten over the head with a shovel&#8230;) If you misread the brief and screwed up, it&#8217;s a good time to correct the problem, but if it&#8217;s a matter of nitpicking it comes down to judgment. See taking feedback literally can be dangerous, taking it with a grain of salt can be tasty &#8211; but stupid.</p>
<p>So how should you deal with a troubling response? Well, sometimes people need to see that something won&#8217;t work. If you get a request for a logo to be blown up 300%, go ahead, do it, but present one with it at 50% too so things are in perspective. Want that body text in bold, italic size 47 Helvetica? OK well sometimes telling people it just won&#8217;t work is an option too&#8230;</p>
<p>In the end, it comes down more to personal taste and judgement than formula and rule. Use that eye and try to get your client enthused about the design you&#8217;ve laboured over. If that doesn&#8217;t work, well you can always take it out of your folio&#8230; or try that Regis trick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.invokemedia.com/but-i-wanted-it-blue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design, Coding, Rapping??</title>
		<link>http://www.invokemedia.com/design-coding-rapping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.invokemedia.com/design-coding-rapping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dario Meli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you tube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invokemedia.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the category of 'Interesting Self Promotion' The Poetic Prophet drops some science on design and coding. I can live without the AOL browser reference but he nails everything else...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fdesign-coding-rapping%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fdesign-coding-rapping%2F&amp;source=invoke&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt">Posted by Dario Meli</span></p>
<p><span>In the category of &#8216;Interesting Self Promotion&#8217; The Poetic Prophet drops some science on design and coding.  I can live without the AOL browser reference but he nails everything else. </span></p>
<p>[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0qMe7Z3EYg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.invokemedia.com/design-coding-rapping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of Being Pretty</title>
		<link>http://www.invokemedia.com/the-importance-of-being-pretty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.invokemedia.com/the-importance-of-being-pretty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invokemedia.com/the-importance-of-being-pretty.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In just a brief one-twentieth of a second people make aesthetic judgments that influence the rest of their experience with an internet site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fthe-importance-of-being-pretty%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fthe-importance-of-being-pretty%2F&amp;source=invoke&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Internet users can give websites a thumbs up or thumbs down in less than the blink of an eye, according to a study by Canadian researchers.</p>
<p>In just a brief one-twentieth of a second &#8212; less than half the time it takes to blink &#8212; people make aesthetic judgments that influence the rest of their experience with an internet site.</p>
<p>The study was published in the latest issue of the Behaviour and Information Technology journal. The author said the findings had powerful implications for the field of website design.</p>
<p>&#8220;It really is just a physiological response,&#8221; Gitte Lindgaard told Reuters on Tuesday. &#8220;So web designers have to make sure they&#8217;re not offending users visually.</p>
<p>&#8220;If the first impression is negative, you&#8217;ll probably drive people off.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the study, researchers discovered that people could rate the visual appeal of sites after seeing them for just one-twentieth of a second. These judgments were not random, the researchers found &#8212; sites that were flashed up twice were given similar ratings both times.</p>
<p>They also matched the responses given by subjects who were shown the sites for longer.</p>
<p>But the results did not show how to win a positive reaction from users, said Lindgaard, a psychology professor at Carleton University in Ottawa. &#8220;When we looked at the websites that we tested, there is really nothing there that tells us what leads to dislike or to like.&#8221;</p>
<p>And while further research may offer more clues, she said the vagaries of personal taste would always be a limiting factor.</p>
<p>&#8220;If design were reducible to a set of principles, wouldn&#8217;t we find an awful lot of similar houses, gardens, cars, rooms?&#8221; said Lindgaard. &#8220;You&#8217;d have no variety.&#8221;</p>
<p>This article originally posted on <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70037-0.html?tw=wn_tophead_10" target="_blank">Wired News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.invokemedia.com/the-importance-of-being-pretty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.invokemedia.com/search-engine-optimization-%c2%bb-design-vs-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.invokemedia.com/search-engine-optimization-%c2%bb-design-vs-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invokemedia.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have to sacrifice all of the creative and artistic elements of your web site to rank in the search engines? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fsearch-engine-optimization-%25c2%25bb-design-vs-seo%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.invokemedia.com%2Fsearch-engine-optimization-%25c2%25bb-design-vs-seo%2F&amp;source=invoke&amp;style=normal&amp;service=ow.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Written by John Krycek for EntireWeb</p>
<p>Do you have to sacrifice all of the creative and artistic elements of your web site to rank in the search engines? Later in this article I’ll show you a real case scenario and the design and SEO approach used.  Thanks to the birth of professional search engine marketers the top ranks are saturated with the pages of companies that can pay for such insight. That said, it’s certainly possible to employ high ranking tactics in your own website. Actually, the most basic tactics can move you up from an 800 position to a 300. However, it’s the top of the scale where efforts seem almost inversely exponential or logarithmic, you put a ton in to see a tiny change in rank.  How do you meld the ambitious overhauls required to attain significant ranking and NOT compromise the design of your site?</p>
<p><strong>Design Can’t Be Ignored</strong></p>
<p>If you have an existing site, you’ve probably tied it into your existing promotional content. Even if you’ve allowed your website to cater to the more free form of the net, it should still be designed as a recognizable extension of your business.  The reasons for doing so are valid, and can’t simply be ignored for the sake of achieving a first age position, can they? If your research into search optimization leaves you shuffling around thoughts of content, keyword saturated copy and varying link text, you are correctly understanding some of the basic pillars of search engine optimization.  And, you aren’t alone if you have this disheartening thought–If I do all this SEO stuff and reach number one across the board, who would stay at my site because it’s so stale and boring I’m even embarrassed to send people there!  There are two ways to successfully combine design and SEO. The first is to be a blue chip and/or Fortune 500 company with multi million dollar advertising and branding budgets to deliver your website address via television, radio, billboards, PR parties and giveaways with your logo.  Since chances are that’s not you, and certainly not me, lets look at the second option.</p>
<p>It begins with some research into your market, some thoughtful and creative planning, and a designer who is a search engine optimizer, and understands at least basic CSS and HTML programming techniques. Or a combination of people with these skills that can work very well together.  Design is for brochures, instant results are for the web  That’s not the whole truth, but it will help compare and contrast design and SEO. In reality, SEO needs the quantity and detail of supporting text that a brochure has, but good web design has to catch a viewer’s attention in 5 seconds. It’s pretty difficult to read and absorb the content of an entire brochure in less than 5 seconds.  Search engines need rich, related, appropriate, changing and poignant content. And for them to rank you, all of that must be on your pages. But if it’s not well organized and broken down into bite size chunks, no one is going to bother learning about what you’re offering.  Construction 101- Attractive Design and SEO  Sadly, it’s very difficult to optimize a site without completely overhauling it. You’ll soon understand why.</p>
<p>Design and SEO must be strongly rooted into every aspect of each other, possessing a true, symbiotic relationship. Lets look at a simplified example of this. Lets say you are optimizing a page for the keyword phrase, “pumpkin bread recipe.”  From a design standpoint “Pumpkin Bread Recipe” would be the heading for the page, in a nice, readable font with the words perhaps an orange-brown color. And lets add a fine, green rule around it.  There are many ways to create that simple, colored heading. However, there is only one way that is best for both design and SEO. That is to use Cascading Style Sheets, or CSS. In addition, that line of code containing “Pumpkin Bread Recipe” needs to be as close to the top of the page as possible (which CSS also allows).  To a viewer, the recipe text might be read more if it were located to the right of a photo of a buttered piece of pumpkin bread on a small plate next to a lightly steaming cup of coffee.  SEO needs to read that ingredient list and baking instructions. Search engines now understand on a rudimentary level that the ingredients are indeed related to the optimized words- pumpkin bread recipe.  Additionally, it would take many extra lines of code to make a table in this example if you didn’t use CSS.</p>
<p>Search engines don’t like extra code. In fact, given enough times, that “extra” code will make the keyword phrases seem less important and hurt rank.  Note: In the page code, a few thousand characters more than you need to get all of that content organized would normally just add to your page load time, and might be acceptable. But to a search engine, that time can really add up. It wont read through page after page, site after site, billionth after billionth character of unimportant code to find the relevant text. Therefore, the less code, the better your chances. Moral- Less code, more content.  SEO usually means REDO  In the previous pumpkin example, CSS will eliminate the need for almost any extra code at all, and provide the means to place the text to the right of the photo.  Now, imagine that someone had already created this page, but done so using other programming methods. The page could very well be W3C compliant, well programmed and got the job done. However, without designing and programming for optimization as in the above illustration, the end result would have no significant rank compared to others that do.  You can be sure that there exist at least 30 web sites built to rank for the keywords “pumpkin bread recipe”.</p>
<p>Note- why did I use the number 30? It’s safe to assume if you’re not on the first three results pages of a search, you’re not being seen.  While this is a simple example, hopefully you understand that it would be impossible to optimize this simple page without redoing it. This isn’t always the case, but extrapolate this into detailed, multiple pages in an entire website and the issue is greatly magnified.  Aesthetic Importance vs. Traffic  Everyone has an idea of what they want their site to look like. The pretty factor- splash pages, cool flash and graphics must now be justified as to their importance to the bottom line. If you want/need to establish an online presence, you will have to make some compromises in these areas.  Understand exactly the role your site should play in your company marketing.  Ask- What is the goal of your website and who is its audience? Is it for existing clients to see? Is it to reach new clients? To venture into yet untapped market segments?  Ask- How strongly do your other marketing efforts promote your site?  Ask- Is your website an extension of your existing collateral that must reflect the same graphical look?  Ask- Is your website meant to assist to your sales force or is it your sales force?  Chances are you wont have any single answers. That’s ok. It will give you some meat for your designer/SEO to digest and develop a solution for you.</p>
<p>Real case of Design balanced with SEO and salability  If you sell jewelry solely online, you must have a catalog of exceptional photography and detailed, high-resolution close up images. But, you must be optimized and rank well if you want to sell any of that jewelry.  If such a company approached me with this project, my recommendation would be this: If you sell a product, people have to see that product. Lots of good images. The site should be slick and sheik and easy to navigate. The home page has to capture the buyer’s attention. If it’s very expensive jewelry, the site should have a lot of class and elegance. If it’s home made jewelry, the site shouldn’t look home made.  However, as you have no store front, if the online community can’t find you, you’re business will fail. So I’d have a very optimized home page with some discussion of the quality of your product, the history of your company, etc. This is also great sales copy. Ad a few special catalog pieces with descriptions below some smartly placed gifs, jpegs and readable type graphics built out of CSS and you’ve got a cool to look at, content rich, well optimized layout.  I’d make the link to your catalog very obvious and prominent. Note the catalog is not the homepage. I’d also include subsequent well written, in depth pages about the history of some specific pieces.</p>
<p>Load them with targeted keywords and a few images. Again, make your catalog link very prominent. In doing so you’re creating relevant content for search engines AND providing additional pages that can rank.  The catalog can be database driven, simple and changeable, and you have the foundation to build your search rank.  Planning Your Site  If your designer is not a search engine optimizer, hire one to work with your designer from the initial development stage of your site. If you would like a visible presence that is not dependant on traditional marketing efforts to get your name around, then you will have to optimize.  However, with advances in html and css, text itself can be a very flexible and attractive design element with endless possibilities. Site optimization consists of some rigid, unbendable rules. It can be intertwined successfully with very creative and attractive design. If your Designer and SEO aren’t the same person or company, make sure they have the same, close working relationship.</p>
<p>——————————————————————————–</p>
<p>About the Author: John Krycek is a creative director at theMouseworks.ca Toronto website design. Learn more about search engine optimization, internet marketing, web development and graphic design in easy, non-technical, up front English at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.invokemedia.com/search-engine-optimization-%c2%bb-design-vs-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
