<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrinking Banks &#8211; Shocking Visualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.invokemedia.com/shrinking-banks-shocking-visualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.invokemedia.com/shrinking-banks-shocking-visualization/</link>
	<description>Hungry? Here&#039;s some food for thought.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinfire</title>
		<link>http://www.invokemedia.com/shrinking-banks-shocking-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-22583</link>
		<dc:creator>spinfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.invokemedia.com/?p=563#comment-22583</guid>
		<description>Shocking... but misleading.

The circles are drawn proportional to diameter, not area.  The area is half the diameter squared, so it produces a much larger effect.  Classic way to lie with statistics/graphs.  It makes other banks look much worse off than JPM.

The numbers alone still tell a grim tale.  Shame the graph isn&#039;t honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shocking&#8230; but misleading.</p>
<p>The circles are drawn proportional to diameter, not area.  The area is half the diameter squared, so it produces a much larger effect.  Classic way to lie with statistics/graphs.  It makes other banks look much worse off than JPM.</p>
<p>The numbers alone still tell a grim tale.  Shame the graph isn&#8217;t honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

